US Navy destroyer forced to veer off course in a ‘maneuver to prevent a collision’ with Chinese ship


New images have revealed the tiny margin between a US Navy destroyer and a Chinese warship sent to head it off in the South China sea during a tense standoff on Sunday.

The confrontation between the two navy vessels took place near disputed territories in the remote Spratly Islands.

China claims nearly all of the South China Sea, though Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam all claim parts of it.


Carl Schuster, a former US Navy captain, told CNN the two ships could have been seconds away from a collision.

‘It’s like slamming on the brakes and turning to the right to avoid a crash on the road,’ he said.  

‘The Chinese ship certainly violated the rules of the road.’

A sequence of United States Navy photos show the exact moment the USS Decatur, pictured left, maneuvers to avoid the Chinese warship, PRC 170, on the right. 

When the USS Decatur sailed within 12 nautical miles – the commonly accepted distance that constitutes territorial waters of a landmass – of the Gaven and Johnson reefs, a Chinese Luyang destroyer responded with an ‘unsafe and unprofessional maneuver’, according to US Pacific Fleet spokesman Commander Nate Christensen.

The Chinese ship then conducted a series of ‘increasingly aggressive maneuvers, and warned the Decatur to depart the area,’ he added.

According to Lieutenant Commander Tim Gorman, during the tense encounter the Chinese ship ‘approached within 45 yards of Decatur’s bow, after which Decatur maneuvered to prevent a collision.’     

The US takes no official position on the competing claims by countries for territories located in the South China Sea. 

Instead, it considers the waters and airspace to be international and regularly conducts what it calls ‘freedom of navigation operations’ in which warships and aircraft travel through disputed zones in order to demonstrate this. 

The People’s Liberation Army opposes these operations in territory it considers China’s, calling them a threat to its sovereignty.

Collin Koh Swee Lean, research fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, said the incident would have contravened the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea agreed to by China and the US, among others, in 2014. 

The code was designed to reduce the chance of accidental encounters and reduce the risk of escalation if one occurs.

‘The reported 45 yards separation gives extremely little margin for safety,’ Koh said. 

‘It seems to me that this was deliberate and could have been sanctioned by higher levels as part of the retaliatory moves by China in recent times.’

In a statement on the incident, the Chinese Ministry of Defense said that its ship had ‘given a warning to leave’ to the vessel after it entered the area ‘without permission.’

‘The US has repeatedly sent warships into the territorial waters near Chinese reefs and islands in the South China Sea,’ it said.

The behavior ‘gravely threatens China’s sovereignty and security, gravely damages relations between China and the US and their militaries, and gravely injures regional peace and stability.’

‘The Chinese military will resolutely perform its defense duties and continue to take all necessary measures to safeguard our sovereignty and the regional peace and stability,’ spokesman Wu Qian said. 

Gaven Reef is one of seven Chinese-claimed outposts in the Spratlys Archipelago. China claims 3,200 acres there and has built ports, runways and other military infrastructure. 

The U.S. would ‘continue to fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows,’ said Gorman, the Pacific Fleet spokesman.

Friendly relations between the two countries have nosedived since Donald Trump became president in 2017.

A trade war launched by Trump has infuriated Beijing, as did his authorization of a $1.3 billion arms sale to Taiwan, which China considers a rebel province and which it claims as its own. 

Washington last week enacted new tariffs against China covering another $200 billion of its imports.


Leave A Reply